There is a great deal of monopoly-like behavior that is making me grit my teeth lately. There is, of course, the MSN-Yahoo potential merger that would give MSN even greater control of online communication than they already possess and limit the choices for individual users. MSN already has enough access to our lives without further growing their presence. Then there is the deal with Amazon and BookSurge.
While Amazon is claiming that their move to consolidate printing of POD titles through the Amazon-owned BookSurge is all about serving the customer, that excuse is too transparent and flimsy to be displayed in public. What Amazon’s poorly disguised goal appears to be is monopolizing the POD and small press publishing market by leveraging its powerful online presence in order to undercut BookSurge’s competitor Lightning Source.
Publishers who refused this “deal” will reportedly have the buy button removed from their Amazon listings. If they want to sell through Amazon, they will be required to pre-print five copies to store in Amazon’s warehouse and sign up for Amazon’s Affiliate program, which would mean they would have to pay both a percentage of sales and an annual fee to Amazon.
The Author’s Guild is reportedly looking into antitrust laws to address this issue.
However, attempting to strong arm small presses and POD publishers is apparently not enough for Amazon. They have now issued a statement that if a publisher sells a book at a deeper discount on the publisher’s website than is offered on Amazon, they will pay the publisher 50% of the publisher’s discounted price rather than on the price sold at Amazon. This would mean if a title was offered for $15 on the publisher’s website and $20 on Amazon, Amazon’s bean counters would only pay the publisher $7.50 rather than the $10 they contractually owed.
Apparently, no one’s ever explained to Amazon’s executives the phrase “getting too big for [their] britches.” Maybe someone should?
On the plus side, PublishAmerica has refused to cave to Amazon’s demands and their books are now no longer available for purchase directly through Amazon. Maybe Amazon’s strong arm tactics will finally put the United States’ scammiest publisher out of business?
Regardless, this is going to be an interesting year in publishing.
I’m going to remove the Amazon search feature from The Commune. While I do that, here’s a few extra links for your reading pleasure:
Amazon faces anti p.o.d. surge, theBookSeller.com, 09APR08
New publishing policy at Amazon angers authors, Seattlepi.com, 09APR08
Inquiries Concerning Amazon.com's "Print on Demand" Policy, Washington Attorney General's Public Notice, 08APR08
14 April 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
Stuff like this - all the giant corporations swallowing up what few outlets there are anymore for a true free market economy - turns me into a sputtering lunatic!
I just want to rage against the machine. Microsoft, Amazon, Walmart, the World Bank, OPEC - just about everyone you turn anymore, you realize everything around you is owned by one giant head.
If Amazon and Microsoft have their way, one day soon they'll control everything, and then we'll learn one of them owns the other and we'll all move into caves next to Pete. If I could find a nice, quiet spot out in the middle of nowhere with running water and flushing toidies, I'd move tomorrow. But I need a nice bed, space for my cats, some writing material, a fridge in my room would be nice.
Oh, and access to all the chocolate soy milk I want. 'kay?
The internet was supposed to be the great equalizer, but it's becoming just another business opportunity.
At the end of March, I attended an interesting lecture titled, "What Is Business?" Among other things, it asked about what the purpose of business is and pointed out that many people considered it the making of profit. The speaker argued that it could, and should, be more than that, that "being in business" does not have to be measured solely, or strictly, by profit, but could also be measure by how the consumer benefits from the business. Benefits could be measured not only in merchandise, but also in jobs, opportunities, environmental impact, etc.
Post a Comment